<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Law Lords on torture:  magnificent,  but for the worm in the apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barder.com/413/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barder.com/413</link>
	<description>Brian Barder&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hatfield</title>
		<link>http://www.barder.com/413/comment-page-1#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barder.com/ephems/?p=413#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Ronnie,
Almost. 
The song was written by &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_J._Piron&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Armand Piron&lt;/a&gt;, the lyrics:
&lt;blockquote&gt;If I could shimmy like my sister Kate
Shake it like jelly on a plate
My mama wanted to know last night
How sister Kate could do it oh so nice
Now, all the boys in the neighborhood
Knew Kate could shimmy, and it&#039;s mighty good
I may be late but I&#039;ll be up to date
When I can shimmy like my sister Kate.
I mean, shake it like my sister Kate.

Now if I could shake it like my sister Kate,
Never stay home, stay out too late
I get my stuff about as high as a kite
You know I do it for you every night.
Now, all the boys in the neighborhood
Knew Kate could shimmy, and it&#039;s mighty good
I know I&#039;m late but I&#039;ll be up to date
When I can shimmy like my sister Kate.
I mean, shake it like my sister Kate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronnie,<br />
Almost.<br />
The song was written by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_J._Piron" rel="nofollow">Armand Piron</a>, the lyrics:</p>
<blockquote><p>If I could shimmy like my sister Kate<br />
Shake it like jelly on a plate<br />
My mama wanted to know last night<br />
How sister Kate could do it oh so nice<br />
Now, all the boys in the neighborhood<br />
Knew Kate could shimmy, and it&#8217;s mighty good<br />
I may be late but I&#8217;ll be up to date<br />
When I can shimmy like my sister Kate.<br />
I mean, shake it like my sister Kate.</p>
<p>Now if I could shake it like my sister Kate,<br />
Never stay home, stay out too late<br />
I get my stuff about as high as a kite<br />
You know I do it for you every night.<br />
Now, all the boys in the neighborhood<br />
Knew Kate could shimmy, and it&#8217;s mighty good<br />
I know I&#8217;m late but I&#8217;ll be up to date<br />
When I can shimmy like my sister Kate.<br />
I mean, shake it like my sister Kate.</p></blockquote>
<p>t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Smartt</title>
		<link>http://www.barder.com/413/comment-page-1#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Smartt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barder.com/ephems/?p=413#comment-779</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wish I could shimmy like my sister Kate.
You should see her shimmy like a jelly on a plate.&quot;

                         Jelly Roll Morton (I think)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wish I could shimmy like my sister Kate.<br />
You should see her shimmy like a jelly on a plate.&#8221;</p>
<p>                         Jelly Roll Morton (I think)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hatfield</title>
		<link>http://www.barder.com/413/comment-page-1#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barder.com/ephems/?p=413#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Brian
Should be shim&lt;b&gt;m&lt;/b&gt;y I think.
It&#039;s a dance.
t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian<br />
Should be shim<b>m</b>y I think.<br />
It&#8217;s a dance.<br />
t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hatfield</title>
		<link>http://www.barder.com/413/comment-page-1#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barder.com/ephems/?p=413#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Brian,
I&#039;ve managed the plough through the entire 91 pages of the judgement.
 And yes, I think Lord Bingham was right.
 I can just see him pulling his hair out as he reached Article 15 of the CAT. He wants to do justice to those who could be detained without charge for long periods. He sees the difficulty SIAC may be placed in when they &quot;investigate&quot;  the sources of the evidence, but he meets the barrier of the clear words of the Art. 15 
&lt;blockquote&gt;.....shall ensure that any statement which is &lt;i&gt;established&lt;/i&gt; to have been made as a result of torture... &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Instead of facing the difficulty head on and perhaps finding himself in the Lord Hope camp, he tries a shimy. 
Let&#039;s just forget that blasted word  &quot;established&quot; and create a new test.
 Much as I want to agree with this approach, the rules of statutory interpretation lead me to the majority view.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Brian replies:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt; Well, I think it all depends on which you regard as more important:  respect for the rules of statutory interpretation of a specific international agreement taken in isolation (whose importance I certainly don&#039;t disparage) or avoiding an interpretation of a major international Covenant which will in practice frustrate its principal purpose and will also conflict in its practical effect with the rest of the law in respect of torture.  The latter seems to me more consistent both with common sense (which I recognise isn&#039;t necessarily the same thing as a correct application of a legal text) and with the preservation of an important principle not only of a specific international covenant but also of customary international and domestic common law going back, in the case of UK common law, for more than three centuries.  In other words, I think that the law lords would have been entitled to adopt a test for &#039;establishing&#039; whether a piece of information had probably been obtained by torture which reflects not only Article 15 of UNCAT but also the whole corpus of international and national common and statute law, including incidentally the Human Rights Act and European Convention of Human Rights, as well as all the other numerous authorities cited throughout all seven judgments.  As I understand it, that was the view taken by Lord Bingham, invariably an exceptionally careful and scrupulous judge, and his two next most senior colleagues.  This is not, as I see it, a conflict between three judges taking an adventurously ambitious view of their right and duty to make new law as well as to interpret existing law, versus four of their brethren who took a more conservative and strictly interpretative view of the court&#039;s functions:  it seems to me more a question of interpreting the whole corpus of existing law and not just one instrument of it, however important, plus avoiding an interpretation of one instrument that would have the practical effect of frustrating its obviously intended effect.

But you&#039;re a lawyer, and I&#039;m not, so I advance my interpretation with considerable diffidence.

Incidentally, what&#039;s a &#039;shimy&#039;?&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,<br />
I&#8217;ve managed the plough through the entire 91 pages of the judgement.<br />
 And yes, I think Lord Bingham was right.<br />
 I can just see him pulling his hair out as he reached Article 15 of the CAT. He wants to do justice to those who could be detained without charge for long periods. He sees the difficulty SIAC may be placed in when they &#8220;investigate&#8221;  the sources of the evidence, but he meets the barrier of the clear words of the Art. 15 </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;..shall ensure that any statement which is <i>established</i> to have been made as a result of torture&#8230; </p></blockquote>
<p>Instead of facing the difficulty head on and perhaps finding himself in the Lord Hope camp, he tries a shimy.<br />
Let&#8217;s just forget that blasted word  &#8220;established&#8221; and create a new test.<br />
 Much as I want to agree with this approach, the rules of statutory interpretation lead me to the majority view.</p>
<p><b><i>Brian replies:</i></b> <i> Well, I think it all depends on which you regard as more important:  respect for the rules of statutory interpretation of a specific international agreement taken in isolation (whose importance I certainly don&#8217;t disparage) or avoiding an interpretation of a major international Covenant which will in practice frustrate its principal purpose and will also conflict in its practical effect with the rest of the law in respect of torture.  The latter seems to me more consistent both with common sense (which I recognise isn&#8217;t necessarily the same thing as a correct application of a legal text) and with the preservation of an important principle not only of a specific international covenant but also of customary international and domestic common law going back, in the case of UK common law, for more than three centuries.  In other words, I think that the law lords would have been entitled to adopt a test for &#8216;establishing&#8217; whether a piece of information had probably been obtained by torture which reflects not only Article 15 of UNCAT but also the whole corpus of international and national common and statute law, including incidentally the Human Rights Act and European Convention of Human Rights, as well as all the other numerous authorities cited throughout all seven judgments.  As I understand it, that was the view taken by Lord Bingham, invariably an exceptionally careful and scrupulous judge, and his two next most senior colleagues.  This is not, as I see it, a conflict between three judges taking an adventurously ambitious view of their right and duty to make new law as well as to interpret existing law, versus four of their brethren who took a more conservative and strictly interpretative view of the court&#8217;s functions:  it seems to me more a question of interpreting the whole corpus of existing law and not just one instrument of it, however important, plus avoiding an interpretation of one instrument that would have the practical effect of frustrating its obviously intended effect.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re a lawyer, and I&#8217;m not, so I advance my interpretation with considerable diffidence.</p>
<p>Incidentally, what&#8217;s a &#8217;shimy&#8217;?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.barder.com/413/comment-page-1#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barder.com/ephems/?p=413#comment-770</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m grateful for Patrick&#039;s powerful and vivid comment.  It helps to bring home the physical reality of what &#039;torture&#039; can mean for a human being.

Jarndyce has posted some interesting (and more optimistic) &lt;a href=&quot;http://fairvotewatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/all-is-not-well-with-lords-and-torture.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; on this on his own blog: well worth a visit. 

&lt;b&gt;Brian&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m grateful for Patrick&#8217;s powerful and vivid comment.  It helps to bring home the physical reality of what &#8216;torture&#8217; can mean for a human being.</p>
<p>Jarndyce has posted some interesting (and more optimistic) <a href="http://fairvotewatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/all-is-not-well-with-lords-and-torture.html" rel="nofollow">comments</a> on this on his own blog: well worth a visit. </p>
<p><b>Brian</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.barder.com/413/comment-page-1#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barder.com/ephems/?p=413#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Brian:

There is always the temptation to excuse the practices of torture by considering the severity of the accusations against the tortured but the reality of this evil practice was brought home to me by an asylum seeker who&#039;s care I was involved with as a surgical SHO during the late 1980s at St Georges.  This patient had been repeatedly tortured in some tinpot African dictator&#039;s gaol until his anal sphincter had been destroyed, leading to permanent faecal incontinence and a spirit that had been broken.  He shook as I took a medical history detailing his torture and the flashbacks he experienced due to his PTSD.

Distasteful to recount on this blog, I&#039;m sure, but the reality of torture is that it&#039;s evil, the people who carry it out are evil and anyone who profits by it are tarred with the same brush.

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:</p>
<p>There is always the temptation to excuse the practices of torture by considering the severity of the accusations against the tortured but the reality of this evil practice was brought home to me by an asylum seeker who&#8217;s care I was involved with as a surgical SHO during the late 1980s at St Georges.  This patient had been repeatedly tortured in some tinpot African dictator&#8217;s gaol until his anal sphincter had been destroyed, leading to permanent faecal incontinence and a spirit that had been broken.  He shook as I took a medical history detailing his torture and the flashbacks he experienced due to his PTSD.</p>
<p>Distasteful to recount on this blog, I&#8217;m sure, but the reality of torture is that it&#8217;s evil, the people who carry it out are evil and anyone who profits by it are tarred with the same brush.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
